Essential Caution for Digital Exposure – Dr Lalith Mendis

Essential Caution for Digital Exposure – Dr Lalith Mendis

Dr Lalith Mendis is the Founder Director of the Empathic Learning Centre, Colombo and was (formerly) Registrar, Dept of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Colombo & Head of  Dept of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Kelaniya. Being a Gold Medalist from Colombo Medical Faculty, in Medicine, Pathology & Pharmacology – Dr Lalith topped his batch on graduation. He has researched the effect of digital overuse on children & youth and developed empathic therapies to reverse inattention, impulsivity & hyperactivity. Dr Mendis hosts the monthly Digital Forum at his centre and has delivered lectures & conducted seminars on this theme in leading schools & Corporates in Colombo. He has also lectured in Germany, Malaysia & UK. Author of five books on the topic, his books Right Learning & Recovering Childhood, Children Our Heritage & Let the Children Come to Me are in their second print. His books are available from all major bookstores in Colombo. His latest book “Parenting Heart & Brain – in an age of digital domination” has a preface from the former Dean of the Medical faculty of Colombo.  “I have been seeing children affected by too much cartoon abuse. This is not about ADHD but normal children with agitation & hyperactivity & inattention in studies”.

Please parent please reduce digital screen.

  1. Before 2 ½ yrs it scrambles speech
  2. Reduces 3D touch & sight which promotes brain wiring
  3. Reduces spatial sense which makes brain brilliant – shapes
  4. Disturbs sleep – ruins memory
  5. Inattention – shallow & short attention span (multidirectional firing of neurones – digital stress
  6. Excess cortisol secretion – fatty liver
  7. Disturbed appetite – lean to junk food & snacking
  8. Disturbed dopamine salience & Serotonin satiety
  9. E-learning does not make brain brilliant. Bottom up regulation rather than top down
  10. Smart screen dumbs down imagination & thought formation
  11. Over wiring of kinaesthetic acoustic & visual – they only want to do more cartoons, entertainment, fashion, décor etc.
  12. Ability to manage logic dumbs down. No desire for professions
  13. Promote addictions – effect like cocaine\
  14. Fantastic unrealistic – even spooky ideas, seek thrill & peril
  15. Collateral damage – porn, violence, magic etc.
  16. Please give your time to your child & not ore screen

How Digital Screen disturbs sleep & memory –

  1. Pixel stream stimulates brain like Cocaine disturbing dopamine U curve – D1 is stimulated above physiological norm
  2. Digital stress inhibits action of serotonin to achieve satiety – as a result serotonin secretion at nerve endings increase causing anxiety disturbing sleep
  3. Digital screen after 6 pm disrupts melatonin secretion
  4. Blue light of the screen disrupts melatonin secretion
  5. Digital stimulation provokes cortisol secretion which reduces the activity of glia cells to remove chemical transmitters from synapses
  6. Digital stress stimulated D2 receptors which causes background restlessness & impaired working memory

Facing the Truth about Digital Overplay.

When the Market drives – truth obliterates for statins, coconut oil & for learning when market drives e-learning

  1. Memory for learning is best facilitated when children see letters off printed page. Pixel screen dumbs memory. After browsing chose the best articles, obtain print copies & study with annotations & underlining. True for adults as well
  2. When young touching letters & seeing letters on print is how brain absorbs language along with hearing words, shapes etc.
  3. Handwriting is the most brain brilliant thing humans can do. Smart screen has made kids hate handwriting
  4. Cursives make brain brilliant (Royal Crown copy books as Thomians knew). USA has done away with cursives
  5. Reading off printed page & hearing stories makes memory & learning
  6. Research proved that pictures crowd out word learning. What damage cartoons have done!
  7. Never read or browse on smart phone. Do most of your e-work on laptop & not Ipad or Tab which produce a continual photons stream to hit your retina & sets of multidirectional firing of neurones, reduces working memory, drives dopamine out of homeostatic U curve, increase serotonin in blood & synapses
  8. Too much digital games also sets up bottom up regulation reducing memory & reinforcing thrill & reward reversal. Reward reversal is when kids or adults have blunted reward motive & move to fantastic, stressful & unpleasant thrills.

Digital Abuse, Drugs & Impaired Cognition

  1. Children are put on the digital screen
  2. Research shows that early exposure to digital screen blunts cognition
  3. Research shows that e-learning methods only make children temporarily smart
  4. They develop addiction, impulsivity, hyperactivity
  5. Children are put on drugs
  6. Disorders are defined to market drugs
  7. Reports on serious side effects are ignored
  8. More drugs are prescribed to stop side effects
  9. A digital world is created to accommodate youth who cannot engage in other leisure
  10. More digital paraphernalia hit the market creating a massive turnover industry
  11. Digital world creates jobs in that world for otherwise unemployable youth. These jobs serve no useful purpose in social development
  12. Market profits at all stages & this generation can be heard driven by the internet for any purpose a future Global Fuehrer has

Learning Curves – Homeostasis

Here’s the pitch today at Alma Mater – too much kinaesthesia stimulation (cartoons, digital games, add on time on LED screen) will suppress learner management tracts (LMT) & overwire Disco brain tracts. You will only get support jobs to advertise, announce & display other people’s success via the screen. If you do LMT well, you will work for your own success.

Learning process for 40 min is supported by Dopamine U curve – moving on to Serotonin U curve for 20 min giving you happy assess. You become open to audit by others also. Too much time on LED screen will destabilise Dopamine U curve with no end to the thrill seeking. From Learner Management cycle (LMC) you have shifted to survival risk cycle (SRC). You are already recruiting neurochemicals kept for emergencies. Whatever you do is right – is your attitude. This makes you vulnerable to external drug stimulus.

Brain works on different tracts that are mediated by different neurochemicals or different receptors. Different concentration of neurochemical acts on a different receptor. Dopamine on D1 or D2. Right concentration of dopamine will act on  D1 for normal effect (Homeostasis). D2 stimulation will bring addictive behaviour.

  1. Executive Empathic action neurochemicals
  2. Reward Tracts.
  3. Stress & risk tracts (reactive reflexive)
  4. Pain – unpleasant tracts (which double up as anti-reward systems)

With too much LED screen kid moves from Executive Empathic to repetitive reactive. Kid is on to vulnerability to addictive behaviour – drugs, porno, gambling, thrill, risk etc.


Digital stimulant effect has 5 components

  • Time length of exposure to LED screen – more than 25 min
  • Pixel per inch (PPI) of smart phone
  • Rate of pixel change in cartoon frame
  • Intensity and variability of sound and colour
  • Time of exposure effect is more after 6 pm
  • Multitasking
  • Sleep deprivation
  • Preserve Screen time for essential study


Appeal to Schools

Parents have to speak to school principals & plead to have scientific talks to staff & kids on the relationship between digital stimulation & drug abuse. “How Much is Too Much”. Schools have to take on responsibility for what happens at home – digital addiction. Parents create the problem. Schools who get children to use Ipad or tab before 12 yrs, must take more care & info on how to prevent digital overdose. Parents must ask schools to include digital safety talks as a part of the curriculum rather than gratis & ad hoc. Most authorities now ask digital medium not to be used until 12 yrs.

Recent Research

It’s been established that screen time in its traditional form—think television and video games—is linked to sleep problems in kids, note researchers in introducing their more specific study: one that, for the first time, looks at touch-screen use among very young children.

What they found is a link to poorer sleep, and it starts as early as infancy. Reporting in the journal Scientific Reports, researchers find that the more kids ages 6 months to 3 years use touch screens during the day, the longer it takes them to fall asleep and the less sleep they log in total.

According to a survey of 715 UK parents, kids 6 to 11 months old use touch screens (in the form of smartphones and/or tablets) an average of 8 minutes a day.

That goes up to 19 minutes for kids ages 12 to 18 months, up again to 25 minutes for kids 19 to 25 months, and up again to 44 minutes for 2-year-olds, reports Live Science.

This addictive effect is why Dr. Peter Whybrow, director of neuroscience at UCLA, calls screens “electronic cocaine” and Chinese researchers call them “digital heroin.” In fact, Dr. Andrew Doan, the head of addiction research for the Pentagon and the US Navy — who has been researching video game addiction — calls video games and screen technologies “digital pharmakeia” (Greek for drug).

It’s ‘digital heroin’: How screens turn kids into psychotic junkies

By Dr. Nicholas Kardaras

Digital Games & Addiction

Some individuals may create on-line personas or “Avatars” where he/she are able to alter his/her identities and pretend to be someone other than himself or herself.  Those at highest risk for creation of a secret life are those who suffer from low-self esteem feelings of inadequacy, and fear of disapproval.  Such negative self-concepts lead to clinical problems of depression and anxiety.

Many persons who attempt to quit their Game use experience withdrawal including: anger, depression, relief, fantasies about the game, mood swings, anxiety, fear, irritability, sadness, loneliness, boredom, restlessness, procrastination, and upset stomach.  Being addicted to video-gaming can also cause physical discomfort or medical problems such as: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, dry eyes, backaches, severe headaches, eating irregularities, such as skipping meals, failure to attend to personal hygiene, and sleep disturbance.

change of neurones from preferred mode firing to non preferred multidirectional firing that reduces working memory & changes in dopamine levels & receptors depend on pixel firing rate of a programme & that is found in games using high pixel turn over – without giving recovery time to neurones. This does not happen with usual work related screen use.

Development Delays

Speech Development – One new finding presented at the 2017 Pediatrics Societies Meeting did find a correlation. The study analyzed over 900 children using parent-reported data on amount of screen time received. The parents reported the screen time of their children at age 18 months. Then, the researchers conducted an evaluation of the children’s development. Using the information reported by parents, researchers found that one-fifth of the children had almost 30 minutes of screen time each day. As screen time increased in some families, children were almost 50 percent more likely to have a speech delay as they developed.

Family Interaction

One major concern that doctors have with young children and technology is their interaction with other people. Babies and children under the age of 3 learn primarily by imitating other people. Technology can interfere with the time a child spends observing and imitating, a likely reason for the speech delays.

In addition, the screen time will interfere with bonding between the child and his family members. As he spends more time absorbed in media, even educational media, he will tune out family members and often fight with siblings over the device being used.

A new study, released Thursday and being presented at the 2017 Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting, revealed some striking findings. (04/05/2017)

  1. The study found that the more time children between the ages of six months and two years spent using handheld screens such as smartphones, tablets and electronic games, the more likely they were to experience speech delays. “I believe it’s the first study to examine mobile media device and communication delay in children,” said Dr. Catherine Birken, the study’s senior investigator and a pediatrician and scientist at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario
  2. Early use of digital screen converts children to visual based learning – making them poor learners when study is verbal based.
  3. Parental use of smart phones are harsh towards children & that makes children adopt gimmicks to gain attention
  4. For the most part, children should stay clear of technology in favor of interaction and active play

Why are kids “doing show” & seeking attention from outside? Simple reason is parents didn’t bond with them when young. They bred a generation who looked for attention from outsiders having not got attention from parents. This turns to attention deficit in the class – they prefer pictures, sounds, visuals, kinaesthesia, dance – they seek attention & will “create drama”.  They will be dull in normal class studies & parents may condemn them further.

Unhealthy Childhood Caused By Digital Screen

Today’s children are being deprived of the fundamentals of a healthy childhood, such as:

  • Emotionally available parents
  • Clearly defined limits and guidance
  • Responsibilities
  • Balanced nutrition and adequate sleep
  • Movement and outdoors
  • Creative play, social interaction, opportunities for unstructured times and boredom

Instead, children are being served with:

  • Digitally distracted parents
  • Indulgent parents who let kids “Rule the world”
  • Sense of entitlement rather than responsibility
  • Inadequate sleep and unbalanced nutrition
  • Sedentary indoor lifestyle
  • Endless stimulation, technological babysitters, instant gratification, and absence of dull moments

YGen Issues

Ygen pioneered the hand on screen lifestyle, much the way Prof Timothy Leary got a generation to pioneer LSD & drug abuse as experimental science. Ygen were wise to keep some contact with reality & seek employment after graduation from ever widening scope of R/brain Uni degrees – design, graphics, fashion, art, drama, entertainment, events, modelling, hospitality etc. in fact it looked a scoop – generation prepared for the digital revolution. “Market knows”. “Let us make man after the image of digital reality” Next generation I gen (Z gen) got the addictions.  They are not seeking employment. Digital games is the career. Fantasy platforms are the reality. Omniscient & pluripotent market steps into create a world in their image – they become prey to digital hara-kiri – blue whale challenge

I-I-L-L (Left Brain) people were 70% & K-M-V (Right Brain) used to be 30%. With the digital revolution KMV expressionists – (kinaesthetic, musical, visual) have dramatically increased – so the explosion of cinema, media, dramatists, fashion, graphics, entertainment, advertisements, cartoons, sports, digital overplus, presenters – more show than do left brain system managements. Also resulting in poor interpersonal & intrapersonal management and reduction of linguistic ability & logical approach plus weak mathematics

Right brain child goes from larger picture to details. She thinks larger picture first. So they are good at décor, fashion, stage set etc. Left brain child goes from details to larger picture. When developed equally a prodigy results. Digital abuse overwires the Right Brain facility & such children can’t do details. Forever they are imagining. Swimming & Music, handwriting help correcting Right & Left brain disparity.

Imbalance in Brain Wiring

  • “Normal” child = usual class room learner – this was thought to be the dominant pattern & took the name of dominant hemisphere in 70% = Left brain = management mode, verbal, mathematical, logical
  • They had dominance in – Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, Linguistic, Logical/mathematical
  • those who had other 3 tracts dominant – Kinaesthetic, Musical, Visual/Spatial (KMV)  – were considered right brain = creative, imaginative, dreamy, visual
  • When the digital revolution hit the children more than normal were wired dominant in the KMV tracts

Overwiring of Kinaesthetic, Musical, Visual/Spatial

  • Generation of whose who show what others do
  • Doing decreased – advertising entertainment increased
  • Increased Response to Risk Centre – Venteromedial aspect of Prefrontal cortex
  • Flight, Fright, Fight
  • On edge risk taking generation
  • Risk in – finances, gambling, sex, courting danger

Cartoons & digital games over-wire & chemicalise the kinaesthetic, music & visual tracts (formerly called Right Brain activism) – overtaking language, mathematical, logical & relational tracts of the brain (formerly called Left brain activism). You get a child who is always in the realm of the fantastic & is bored with the normal. Present day spooky cartoons introduce even the paranormal resulting in fear, disturbed sleep & depression. Why shouldn’t give daily  cartoons or daily digital games is because anything done daily becomes an addictive feeder habit. Somehow make it every other day. Over 30 min of anything wires a tract memory. So limit to less than 30 min.



Gender Ideology Harms Children

The American College of Pediatricians urges healthcare professionals, educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality.

1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of male and female, respectively – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sex development (DSDs), including but not limited to testicular feminization and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs (also referred to as “intersex”) do not constitute a third sex.1

2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one. No one is born with an awareness of themselves as male or female; this awareness develops over time and, like all developmental processes, may be derailed by a child’s subjective perceptions, relationships, and adverse experiences from infancy forward. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women.2,3,4

3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V).5 The psychodynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved.2,4,5

4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty- blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child.6

5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.5

6. Pre-pubertal children diagnosed with gender dysphoria may be given puberty blockers as young as eleven, and will require cross-sex hormones in later adolescence to continue impersonating the opposite sex. These children will never be able to conceive any genetically related children even via articifial reproductive technology. In addition, cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to cardiac disease, high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke, diabetes, and cancer.7,8,9,10,11

7. Rates of suicide are nearly twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ – affirming countries.12 What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?

8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

Michelle A. Cretella, M.D.
President of the American College of Pediatricians

Quentin Van Meter, M.D.
Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians
Pediatric Endocrinologist

Paul McHugh, M.D.
University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School and the former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital

Scientists alive today who accept the biblical account of creation

Note: Individuals on this list must possess a doctorate in a science-related field.



The Age of Newton

  • Isaac Newton (1642–1727) (WOH) Dynamics; Calculus; Gravitation law; Reflecting telescope; Spectrum of light (wrote more about the Bible than science, and emphatically affirmed a Creator. Some have accused him of Arianism, but it’s likely he held to a heterodox form of the Trinity—See Pfizenmaier, T.C., Was Isaac Newton an Arian? Journal of the History of Ideas68(1):57–80, 1997)
  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz (1646–1716) Mathematician, co-inventor of calculus
  • John Flamsteed (1646–1719) Greenwich Observatory Founder; Astronomy
  • William Derham (1657–1735) Ecology
  • Cotton Mather (1662–1727) Physician
  • John Harris (1666–1719) Mathematician
  • John Woodward (1665–1728) Paleontology
  • William Whiston (1667–1752) Physics, Geology
  • John Hutchinson (1674–1737) Paleontology
  • Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758) Best known as a leading theologian, but also Physics, Meteorology, Immunology
  • Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778) Taxonomy; Biological classification system
  • Jean Deluc (1727–1817) Geology
  • Richard Kirwan (1733–1812) Mineralogy
  • William Herschel (1738–1822) Galactic astronomy; Uranus (probably believed in an old-earth)
  • James Parkinson (1755–1824) Physician (old-earth compromiser*)
  • John Dalton (1766–1844) Atomic theory; Gas law
  • John Kidd, M.D. (1775–1851) Chemical synthetics (old-earth compromiser*)


Just Before Darwin

  • Timothy Dwight (1752–1817) Educator
  • William Kirby (1759–1850) Entomologist
  • Jedidiah Morse (1761–1826) Geographer
  • Benjamin Barton (1766–1815) Botanist; Zoologist
  • John Dalton (1766–1844) Father of the Modern Atomic Theory; Chemistry
  • Samuel Miller (1770–1840) Clergy
  • Charles Bell (1774–1842) Anatomist
  • John Kidd (1775–1851) Chemistry
  • Humphrey Davy (1778–1829) Thermokinetics; Safety lamp
  • Peter Mark Roget (1779–1869) Physician; Physiologist
  • Michael Faraday (1791–1867) (WOH) Electromagnetism; Field theory, Generator
  • Samuel F.B. Morse (1791–1872) Telegraph
  • Joseph Henry (1797–1878) Electric motor; Galvanometer

Just After Darwin

  • Henry Rogers (1808–1866) Geology
  • James Glaisher (1809–1903) Meteorology
  • Philip H. Gosse (1810–1888) Ornithologist; Zoology
  • Sir Henry Rawlinson (1810–1895) Archaeologist
  • James Simpson (1811–1870) Gynecology, Anesthesiology
  • Sir Joseph Henry Gilbert (1817–1901) Agricultural Chemist
  • James Joule (1818–1889) Thermodynamics
  • Thomas Anderson (1819–1874) Chemist
  • Charles Piazzi Smyth (1819–1900) Astronomy
  • George Stokes (1819–1903) Fluid Mechanics
  • Rudolph Virchow (1821–1902) Pathology
  • Gregor Mendel (1822–1884) (WOH) Genetics
  • Louis Pasteur (1822–1895) (WOH) Chemical chirality, Bacteriology, Biochemistry; Sterilization; Immunization
  • Henri Fabre (1823–1915) Entomology of living insects
  • William Thompson, Lord Kelvin (1824–1907) Energetics; Absolute temperatures; Atlantic cable
  • William Huggins (1824–1910) Astral spectrometry
  • Bernhard Riemann (1826–1866) Non-Euclidean geometries
  • Joseph Lister (1827–1912) Antiseptic surgery
  • Balfour Stewart (1828–1887) Ionospheric electricity
  • James Clerk Maxwell (1831–1879) (WOH) Electrodynamics; Statistical thermodynamics
  • P.G. Tait (1831–1901) Vector analysis
  • John Bell Pettigrew (1834–1908) Anatomist; Physiologist
  • John Strutt, Lord Rayleigh (1842–1919) Similitude; Model Analysis; Inert Gases
  • Sir William Abney (1843–1920) Astronomy
  • Alexander MacAlister (1844–1919) Anatomy
  • A.H. Sayce (1845–1933) Archaeologist
  • John Ambrose Fleming (1849–1945) Electronics; Electron tube; Thermionic valve

The Modern Period

  • Dr Clifford Burdick, Geologist (1919–2005)
  • George Washington Carver (1864–1943) Inventor
  • L. Merson Davies (1890–1960) Geology; Paleontology
  • Douglas Dewar (1875–1957) Ornithologist
  • Howard A. Kelly (1858–1943) Gynecology
  • Paul Lemoine (1878–1940) Geology
  • Dr Frank Marsh, Biology (1899–1992)
  • Dr John Mann, Agriculturist, biological control pioneer
  • Edward H. Maunder (1851–1928) Astronomy
  • William Mitchell Ramsay (1851–1939) Archaeologist
  • William Ramsay (1852–1916) Isotopic chemistry, Element transmutation
  • Charles Stine (1882–1954) Organic Chemist
  • Dr Arthur Rendle-Short (1885–1955) Surgeon
  • Sir Cecil P. G. Wakeley (1892–1979) Surgeon
  • Dr Larry Butler, Biochemist
  • Prof. Verna Wright, Rheumatologist (1928–1998)
  • Arthur E. Wilder-Smith (1915–1995) Three science doctorates; a creation science pioneer




The Lancet (2003;361:573-574) under the title “Effect of ibuprofen on cardioprotective effect of aspirin” documents how NSAIDS interferes with the cardio-protective effect of low dose aspirin. I documented this ten years previously in 1993, in The Ceylon Medical Journal (1993. 38:145-146) under the title “Do NSAIDs interfere with the action of low dose aspirin.

I cite this issue only because I also documented the factual status of aspirin in analgesia and as an anti-inflammatory drug being probably superior to many recent NSAIDs including ibuprofen. ( Mendis, B. L. J. 1995. Joint disease, aspirin and NSAIDs. Kandy Medical Journal, 5: 1-3. Mendis, B. L. J. 1994. short term loans compare Avoiding nightmares in migraine management. Journal of the Ceylon College of Physicians, 27: 54 – 55. Mendis, BLJ. 1996. Aspirin::friend or fiend. Ceylon Medical Journal. 41:76-77.)

Since The Lancet has concluded as I did on the effect of NSAIDs on the action of low dose aspirin, I am hopeful that my colleagues would seriously consider the conclusion of the aforementioned articles, namely, that soluble aspirin is equal or superior for joint disease and headaches compared to the branded preparations that are much prescribed though expensive, have no proven higher therapeutic efficacy and have more side effects.

I am aware that what I am suggesting sounds incredulous but is 1 hr loans based on sound documentation. E.g. soluble aspirin instead of piroxicam. Please take the trouble to read the articles cited in the above references. Should we not be ethically concerned to give the patients a better deal – medically and economically? Drug companies at present do not include aspirin in comparative trials. You are probably aware how a research on COX2 inhibitors was contrived to hide the truth of adverse effects until a journalist on the Washington Post brought it to light. You may read Therapeutic Letter Issue 43 on this.

This letter goes out to a few whom I felt would be concerned.   

Scary Power Play for Nations Barter – Protect Your Nation in the Family of Nations from Global Dinosaurs

Scary Power Play for Nations Barter – Protect Your Nation in the Family of Nations from Global Dinosaurs

Functioning as a hostile compete state acting within an existing state, it has an alternate infrastructure. Political warfare operates as one of the activities of the “counter-state.” Political warfare uses non-violent methods such as participation that undermines the morale or offers to engage in discussions, as an adjunct to violence. Political warfare methods can be implemented at strategic, operations, or tactical levels of operation.

Political warfare is warfare. Strategic information campaigns designed to delegitimize nation state & nation based political leaders, through disinformation arise out of non-violent lines of effort in political warfare regimes.

Understanding the New Left Liberal (NLL)

On July 8th 2017 on the streets of Hamburg they were causing havoc, asking Governments of G 20 nations to “go to hell” – which hell they deny!!!   They are anti Govt, anti nation, anti capitalist, anti family, anti marriage, anti truth, anti establishment, anti boundaries, anti authority. The Old Left fought to save their nation from Imperialist expansionism. The Old Left should stand squarely opposed to this neo colonial invasion. New Left fights to dismantle nation claiming any stand up for your nation as racist, demanding polity without boundaries – they serve the globalist expansionism – fake press their marketing evangelists & neo liberal economists their prophets. The Digital screen plays a vital & destructive role on gender blurring – often heroes & monsters are sexless.

The ideology runs on multiple lines of operation, support the larger non-violent line of effort, are coordinated with violent lines of effort, and execute political warfare agenda promoting cultural Marxist outcomes. They principally operate through narratives. Because the New cultural left is aligned with Islamist organizations at local, national and international levels, recognition should be given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate through coordinated synchronized interactive narratives … These attacks narratives are pervasive, full spectrum and institutionalized at all levels. They operate in social media, television, the 24-hour news cycle in all media and are entrenched at the upper levels of the bureaucracies, celebrities, fake news. Globalists find left liberal & Islamist synchronization offers quickest occupying force. They use the Islamist militancy to their own end of destroying nation boundaries. This promotes illegal immigrants who are available for violent incitation. Create orphans & make them violent monsters. Fake news is generated intentionally as warfare  to decapitate any Head of State who will resist globalist state. Three kinds of people adopt globalism.

  1. Those who fail in their nation in life pursuits – especially those who have an orphan spirit & father fracture.
  2. Biz people who hope to get a better slice in a globalised economy having not done too well in national Biz
  3. Real Master Players (Zorros kind) – who make it rich & connive to concentrate wealth & power in their hands by appointing their puppets to Head of State. Sovereign Nations become mere Capital in their enterprise as happened to Italy, Greece, Spain.
  4. Global religion facilitators

Political Warfare has been described as “propaganda in battledress.”